[Ukv]

> Talk to your local security engineer :)

You made the claim - I'm interested to hear why you believe it, because I suspect it's based on a misunderstanding of how KeePass works.

> and think they can just stand up businesses without understanding the domain

Using KeePass is not analogous to standing up a business.

[Esophagus4]

Ok - I made the assumption that your (s)FTP was publicly available over the internet. (It’s safer if not, but then you don’t get the benefits of syncing from anywhere that I get.)

If your FTP is open to the internet, you are now responsible for alerting / monitoring, IPS/IDS, proper config management, routine automated patching, IP allow/blocklisting… all of these things require regular maintenance. Even if you stick it behind a VPN, you will need to patch, alert on, and configure the VPN and everything behind it as well, as VPNs can be compromised.

That’s why, unless I really wanted to spend time hardening the spit out of it, there’s no way I’m self hosting my passwords. I’m happy to just pay a password manager to handle all of that.

[Ukv]

> you are now responsible for [...] there’s no way I’m self hosting my passwords

You don't need to host anything new or take on any patching responsibilities for anything you weren't before. I already had an FTP server, so put it on there. Wherever you already access arbitrary files across devices (you didn't answer what you do for files outside of your filetype-specific subscriptions, but I'd assume you just have iCloud or something) should work fine.

Not that there are zero reasons to use a SaaS password manager, just that I disagree Keepass is somehow insecure or prohibitively technical for regular users. The solution a lot of people already seem to gravitate towards (if not just password reuse) is "passwords.txt on Google Drive".