Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by locknitpicker 29 days ago
> Misleading headline; if you look at the actual US government source, (...)

Let's pause a moment to think about this sentence alone.
1 comments
strken 29 days ago
Vague innuendo doesn't stop the headline from being misleading, since it's based on that same source.
link
locknitpicker 29 days ago
> Vague innuendo

There is no innuendo. The only claim in this discussion is trying to cast doubt on semantics such as whether "destroyed" or "damaged" has a meaningful difference.

In the meantime, let's verify what the US government classifies as "damage".

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo

This doesn't even fit the old "the front fell off" skit.

link