There is no innuendo. The only claim in this discussion is trying to cast doubt on semantics such as whether "destroyed" or "damaged" has a meaningful difference.
In the meantime, let's verify what the US government classifies as "damage".
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo
This doesn't even fit the old "the front fell off" skit.
There is no innuendo. The only claim in this discussion is trying to cast doubt on semantics such as whether "destroyed" or "damaged" has a meaningful difference.
In the meantime, let's verify what the US government classifies as "damage".
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo
This doesn't even fit the old "the front fell off" skit.