|
|
|
|
|
|
by adastra22
40 days ago
|
|
|
We're talking about artificial intelligence. Making computers think the way people do. People are are notoriously miscalibrated on their own self-assessed probabilities too. Finding a way to objectively calibrate a sense of "how confident do I feel about this?" would be fantastic. But let's not move goal posts. It would still be incredibly useful to have a machine that can merely matches the equivalent statement of confidence or uncertainty that a human would assign to their mental model, even if badly calibrated. |
|
|
> It would still be incredibly useful to have a machine that can merely matches the equivalent statement of confidence or uncertainty that a human would assign to their mental model, even if badly calibrated.
If human feelings are badly calibrated, they are useless here too, so no, I don't agree. Things like "confidence" only matter if they are actually tied to real outcomes in a consistent way, and that means calibration.