|
|
|
|
|
|
by D-Machine
37 days ago
|
|
|
IMO it is you who are moving the goalposts, most likely in an attempt to hide the fact you were unaware of calibration before this discussion. > It would still be incredibly useful to have a machine that can merely matches the equivalent statement of confidence or uncertainty that a human would assign to their mental model, even if badly calibrated. If human feelings are badly calibrated, they are useless here too, so no, I don't agree. Things like "confidence" only matter if they are actually tied to real outcomes in a consistent way, and that means calibration. |
|
|