> The comment is relevant to the suspicion that THE software is using (distributing) some OSS code without attribution.
The accusations in the comment are relevant.
Framing it as a conversation with an LLM and showing its responses, when that LLM does not have access to the answer and is fully making up a response, is irrelevant and distracting.
It's both and I don't see how that matters.
> The comment is relevant to the suspicion that THE software is using (distributing) some OSS code without attribution.
The accusations in the comment are relevant.
Framing it as a conversation with an LLM and showing its responses, when that LLM does not have access to the answer and is fully making up a response, is irrelevant and distracting.