|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
45 days ago
|
|
> It's a software, not a machine. It's both and I don't see how that matters. > The comment is relevant to the suspicion that THE software is using (distributing) some OSS code without attribution. The accusations in the comment are relevant. Framing it as a conversation with an LLM and showing its responses, when that LLM does not have access to the answer and is fully making up a response, is irrelevant and distracting. |
|