Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xyzelement 67 days ago
Ok I am not sure what exact point you are making or arguing with. The op grew up as 1 of 3 and I think that's better than 1 of 1 :)
1 comments

3 means 3x the chance of them all being taken away when something goes wrong. 1 seems better if your goal is to have at least one child remaining in custody with you to age 18, since if anything goes wrong other than a provable unavoidable medical accident they're typically all seized.
This seems like an absolutely insane thing to optimize for but if this is anything like personal experience for you I am really sorry.