[ownagefool]

Nobody really tries to get technical people to do the work.

Like cool, it's a great idea and would potentially produce positive results if done well, but the roles pay half the engineering roles, and the interviews are stacked towards compliance frameworks.

There's very little ability to fix a large public company when HR is involved

[pxc]

Maybe it should be treated like on-call duty and have the load spread between existing engineers on some kind of schedule, maybe with some extra comp as incentive because it's boring and will take more effort/time in the "easy case" compared to pager duty.

[disgruntledphd2]

I think 12-24 month rotations would work really well, but given how the profession is currently setup, that would be difficult to do.

[disgruntledphd2]

Speaking as a technical (data) person currently working in internal audit for a not quite public company, it's not entirely uncommon.

I do agree that the pay isn't great, but it's the fact that it's considered a cost centre that's been the issue for me.

[jacquesm]

Everything except for sales tends to be seen as a cost centre. It's ridiculous.