|
|
|
|
|
by gus_massa
81 days ago
|
|
Nice game. I had to bruteforce it! [spoiler alert] Each column is independent, so we can analyze first just one of them. After a few cases, with any initial digit guaranty to win in 4 tries, but the better first number are rot13(barguerrfrirabeavar) because average of the expected number of attempts is 2.6 but with the other digits it's 2.7. The difference is bigger when you consider the 5 columns, because the slowest column ruins the game. With the good initial digits you have a 41% chance of using 4 attempts and with the bad 67%. The average of the expected numbers of attempts is 3.4 vs 3.7. (If you program a version with more columns, he difference increase even more.) My recommendation is to start with rot13(nyybarfbenyyavarf) because it makes analyzing the second step much easier, but any random combination of the good digits is a good first number. |
|
Only 16% of plays are solved in 3 or fewer guesses.
Curious if the all-ones strategy "feels" fun or if it feels like grinding.