Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by the_real_cher 103 days ago
Its impossible to ignore when a company laysoff thousands but then has thousands if verifiable H1Bs in the H1B logs.

I agree with you. I'm not arguing for or against it.

I do think leaving it out of the conversation is a willful choice and blaming job loss solely on AI is becoming propaganda at this point.

1 comments

Employees on work visas are the first and easiest employees to lay off because we don't see our insurance premiums rise when laying them off (it's what most of us did early during COVID). And now with the $100K fees we have no incentive to hire most employees on a work visa anyhow.

Hear that sound? It's the sound of GCCs opening in Poland, Romania, Israel, and India with those employees who were on work visas in the US now in charge.

If you remain in a major tech hub like the Bay or NYC where you are close to early stage capital, you are secure as it gives you a density of established and early stage employers which makes job hunting easier.

If you are in an inshoring hub like Atlanta, RTP, Denver, Minneapolis, or Pittsburg you're in big trouble.

If you are remote first and lack a network of friends and colleagues in the Bay and NYC who can personally vouch and refer you for roles at their companies you're in big trouble.

If you are a bootcamp grad, you are also in trouble so get the cheapest online degree you can that forces you to take a real algorithms and systems programming class.

Edit: can't reply

> The matter of fact nature of your reply sounds highly, personally anecdotal. Given the confluence of moving parts from AI and policy/politics alone, let alone potential regional instability and the effects on US financial markets, it’s really impossible to speak to the next quarter, let alone year/years. Not saying your prediction is not correct, but few are

Well, duh. This is an anonymous forum, not a research paper. That said, I am speaking from my personal experience, and a couple of other decisionmakers on HN have also voiced similar sentiments on here.

It's free advice - take or don't. It's not my problem. To quote Buck Strickland, "I ain't yo daddy".

The matter of fact nature of your reply sounds highly, personally anecdotal. Given the confluence of moving parts from AI and policy/politics alone, let alone potential regional instability and the effects on US financial markets, it’s really impossible to speak to the next quarter, let alone year/years. Not saying your prediction is not correct, but few are.
Meta MLE hiring seems to still be going strong. They recently picked up a whole slew of people - all H1B - from one of the UCSD labs to work at HQ.
> Meta MLE hiring

> from one of the UCSD labs

That's why.

For bleeding edge R&D, we still hire domestically because the capacity, network, and capital remains in the US, but these roles will overwhelmingly be in the Bay or NYC as I mentioned above, and will overwhelmingly recruit from a handful of top programs with an established track record.

Most HNers are median or below median (that's how medians work because life is a Gaussian distribution) so a large portion will be negatively impacted.

Sam who did his BSCS at Michigan State and Sandeep who did his MSCS without a thesis at SUNY New Platz will be negatively impacted, but Sarah who did her BSCS at UT Austin or Sarita who did her MSCS with thesis at UIUC will be hired.

Similarly for L1/2, it ain't happening unless you have a proven track record at a US comparable office like MSRL Bangalore, but that candidate would have ended up at a top CS program doing an MS/PhD anyhow and have a relatively easy path to immigrate to the US.

Basically, the same funda that exists in India about university tiers for hiring has returned to the US, but a lot of HNers aren't ready for this level of competition.

The difference between Kamal who is slogging at a mid-level SWE at Infosys in Indore and Karl who's working as a SWE at Cisco's NC office is marginal - both are going to be made structurally unemployed, with Kamal's work going to be automated with a CodeGen LLM in the hands of a junior SWE, and Karl's job being moved to a Cisco GCC in India, Eastern Europe, or LatAm.

The only way either can protect themselves is to find a way to end up at a top employer in a major hub.

Edit: can't reply

> What do you mean

Basically, it's best for all of us (be us SWEs, PMs, VCs, or SEs) to assume that we are average or below average, as that allows us to think strategically and defensively, thus allowing us to reduce our risk and take any advantage that we can.

That requires a level of competitiveness and strategic thinking that some may find distasteful, but it's the only way you can survive in the industry long term.

It doesn't mean hurt or negatively impact anyone always, but it requires one to be realistic and recognize that we are not in a stag-hunt but a Hobbesian trap.

> Most HNers are median or below median (that's how medians work because life is a Gaussian distribution)

What do you mean?

My point was that H1B hiring still seems strong. Despite the fees and stuff.

Otherwise yeah what you're saying makes sense.

It depends on the tier of H1B hiring. I think you study/studied at an INI so your peer group has more in common with Sarah and Sarita instead of Sam, Sandeep, Karl, or Kamal.

In a lot of cases, Sandeep used to be Kamal, and these are the Desis on H1Bs or L1s who are getting laid off or forced to consider moving back to India, the UK, the EU, Australia, etc.

Tracks, I guess. MSDS@UCSD, MSA@GT, MSCS@CMU all got jobs at meta, IBM, amazon. First two in the bay, third one as well I think. MSCS@NCSU got an internship at amazon but did not get full time yet. MSCS@NEU also did not get anything yet. CS@Columbia did not get anything, but EE@Columbia (semicon stuff) got one in bell labs NJ.

Although naturalization is pretty difficult, I guess it's still a good deal to return at 30 with 4cr starting wealth.

I don't know what a GCC is but I assure you that no one is opening offices in Israel.
I can assure you otherwise - hell two of my Israeli/American startups are about to come out of stealth in the coming days as RSAC is approaching.

Even with the current Iran War and the Gaza War, it's been business as usual.

Edit: can't reply

> You may be putting your money there, but consumers aren't having it

Most companies aren't B2C or B2B2C. Enterprise and B2B is solely outcome driven.

Look at the blowback on Vercel after the CEO went to Israel. You may be putting your money there, but consumers aren't having it.
Not right now, but there's a big tech scene in Tel Aviv and that won't go away for a while.