[fluidcruft]

All of that's irrelevant for what "newspeak" means.

[abustamam]

Maybe, but the comment I was replying to wasn't talking about newspeak.

[furyofantares]

It's in a reply chain that's talking about newspeak. You compacted your context way too early.

[abustamam]

The reply chain is talking about newspeak but the parent of the comment I was replying to was

> DoW is newspeak. Thats not it's name.

I understood that comment I was replying to was responding to was replying to the latter part of the comment.

Discussions and threads can evolve. They are not static.

[fluidcruft]

I'm confused... now you were talking about newspeak? How odd.

[abustamam]

I'm not sure how you got that from my comment.

[fluidcruft]

As a recap, my reply to your reply was that DoD is the actual newspeak, and your reply to that evolution of the discussion is that you were not discussing newspeak.

[fluidcruft]

Oh apologies, I interpreted your comment as intended to be part of the discussion rather than as a non-sequitur.

[abustamam]

Discussions and conversations can evolve. Read the thread again.