Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by abustamam 109 days ago
Maybe, but the comment I was replying to wasn't talking about newspeak.
2 comments

It's in a reply chain that's talking about newspeak. You compacted your context way too early.
The reply chain is talking about newspeak but the parent of the comment I was replying to was

> DoW is newspeak. Thats not it's name.

I understood that comment I was replying to was responding to was replying to the latter part of the comment.

Discussions and threads can evolve. They are not static.

I'm confused... now you were talking about newspeak? How odd.
I'm not sure how you got that from my comment.
As a recap, my reply to your reply was that DoD is the actual newspeak, and your reply to that evolution of the discussion is that you were not discussing newspeak.
In trying to understand if I'm missing something, I looked up what newspeak means. I (as well as probably a few other commenters based on the contents of their comments) was under the assumption it meant "new speak" meaning it's something new.

In case anyone else reading this was not aware of this, this is what I discovered.

It's a term from George Orwell's 1984, describing a language used to make thoughts unthinkable by removing words from the language. It has nothing to do with "age of the term."

Hence, Dept of Defense is indeed newspeak. Dept of War, while being a new name for the dept, is too literal to be newspeak.

Thanks for the opportunity for me to learn something!

Oh apologies, I interpreted your comment as intended to be part of the discussion rather than as a non-sequitur.
Discussions and conversations can evolve. Read the thread again.