|
|
|
|
|
by iFire
118 days ago
|
|
You've got a good point. Why not directly have the llm write ISA assembly. We're still grading based on results / theory proofs and for example the certifications for cryptographical government use are based on binary codes and not sources. Edited: Why not go further and print the chips, pcbs directly via 3d printing with llm instructions. Edited (joke): Why not go the furthest and turn the entire earth into a computer and grey goo? |
|
The honest ernest answer to that is it's a bad idea because it is not portable. Unfortunately for Intel, m they don't have the dominance they once did, so you have to pick between ARM, x86, or something more exotic, and then be attached to that specific ISA. It's an interesting thought tho.