[lovich]

You are upset about the federal government taking power over the states but are happy to have the power now concentrated under one man.

I don’t think you’ve thought through your point or you are desperately struggling to get through the cognitive dissonance. Nothing has indicated that SCOTUS will defang Trump. Their history so far has been heads Trump wins, tails Trumps enemy loses.

Like they ruled Biden couldn’t cancel student loans but then bend over backward to let Trump do as he pleases.

You’re getting a king, not a return of power to the states

[yieldcrv]

I’m getting harmonization of federal agencies that shouldnt have existed in this form to begin with, I understand why Congress tried to make agencies outside of the purview of the Executive

I think its a speedbump that now they all will be under the purview of the Executive

Its not controversial to me as most of them already are and were never suggested to be outside of it, most agencies weren't formed as independent just a couple

the entire paradigm should be scrapped, in the mean time their sovereignty over a domain is gone

the other side gets a President eventually too, if that freaks out Republicans then they can get consensus with the currently freaked out Democrats to change it

[lovich]

The sovereignty isn’t gone, it was moved to the president directly.

While this SCOTUS is tossing out the chevron defense because Congress apparently shouldn’t be able to delegate out broad power and needs to pass a law for each chemical agencies like the DEA are supposed to police, they are going to green light the agencies set aside as independent by Congress and let the President do whatever he wants.

This is just another executive power grab adding to the Imperial Presidency.

I also am not confident in the other side getting power again given that this admin is the only one in the history of the United States who disrupted the peaceful transfer of power, and no I’m not referencing the J6 riots but their false slate of electors in multiple states which was the real attempt to overthrow the government

[president_zippy]

It's Chevron DEFERENCE; not DEFENSE.

Everyone who replied completely missed my point, despite how simply and clearly I worded it. You're doing a masterful job illustrating it.

Everyone around here thinks that just because you don't need a college degree to become a software engineer or found an eventual multibillion dollar software company, that the same must generalize to every other profession, including biotech, law, and even medicine. Every technocrat is under the same delusion as Bill Gates that succeeding in their software qualifies them to do anything, despite the face that most people around here cannot even change their own spark plug or replace a flat tire.

I have an opinion on Chevron deference: letting party in a lawsuit interpret the laws and regulations concerning their own case is asinine. However, I don't pretend to know whether or not it can or should hold up in court based on stare decisis or any particular legal tradition.

More importantly, I don't operate under some delusion that other people would benefit from hearing my opinion on matters outside my own education or vocation.

"A fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards." -Proverbs 29:11