|
|
|
|
|
|
by lovich
176 days ago
|
|
|
The sovereignty isn’t gone, it was moved to the president directly. While this SCOTUS is tossing out the chevron defense because Congress apparently shouldn’t be able to delegate out broad power and needs to pass a law for each chemical agencies like the DEA are supposed to police, they are going to green light the agencies set aside as independent by Congress and let the President do whatever he wants. This is just another executive power grab adding to the Imperial Presidency. I also am not confident in the other side getting power again given that this admin is the only one in the history of the United States who disrupted the peaceful transfer of power, and no I’m not referencing the J6 riots but their false slate of electors in multiple states which was the real attempt to overthrow the government |
|
|
Everyone who replied completely missed my point, despite how simply and clearly I worded it. You're doing a masterful job illustrating it.
Everyone around here thinks that just because you don't need a college degree to become a software engineer or found an eventual multibillion dollar software company, that the same must generalize to every other profession, including biotech, law, and even medicine. Every technocrat is under the same delusion as Bill Gates that succeeding in their software qualifies them to do anything, despite the face that most people around here cannot even change their own spark plug or replace a flat tire.
I have an opinion on Chevron deference: letting party in a lawsuit interpret the laws and regulations concerning their own case is asinine. However, I don't pretend to know whether or not it can or should hold up in court based on stare decisis or any particular legal tradition.
More importantly, I don't operate under some delusion that other people would benefit from hearing my opinion on matters outside my own education or vocation.
"A fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards." -Proverbs 29:11