[claar]

It's paywalled.

[sjsdaiuasgdia]

https://archive.is/s1psp

[ddtaylor]

The article is paywalled, but it also only calls the person "the hacker" and then says this:

> The hacker, known online by his X handle @greentheonly, did not testify in the case.

So, we have information that we cannot prove being given by a person who won't testify in court? How is this proper chain of evidence, etc.?