|
|
|
|
|
|
by ddtaylor
301 days ago
|
|
|
The article is paywalled, but it also only calls the person "the hacker" and then says this: > The hacker, known online by his X handle @greentheonly, did not testify in the case. So, we have information that we cannot prove being given by a person who won't testify in court? How is this proper chain of evidence, etc.? |
|
|