[saagarjha]

Sure, but you can make money in the field and retire faster than it becomes irrelevant. FWIW none of the ideas here are novel or nontransferable–it's just the specific design that is proprietary. Understanding how to do an AllReduce has been of theoretical interest for decades and will probably remain worth doing far into the future.

[j45]

Tech is always like this.

You move from one thing to the next.

With your transferable skills, experience and thinking that is beyond one programming language.

Even Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

[victor106]

> Even Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

Really!!! Any resources you can share?

[j45]

It’s one way but still something.

https://9to5mac.com/2025/07/15/apples-machine-learning-frame...

[almostgotcaught]

> Even Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

This is like when journalists write clickbait article titles by omitting all qualifiers (eg "states banning fluoride" when it's only some states).

One framework added a CUDA backend. You think all of Apple uses only one framework? Further what makes you think this even gets internal use?

[j45]

I didnt say any of those things at all.

Only that Apple not only might use CUDA internally but made a public release available too.

CUDA seems to be a trigger word in this thread for some.

https://9to5mac.com/2025/07/15/apples-machine-learning-frame...

[almostgotcaught]

> I didnt say any of those things at all.

what does this sentence mean?

> Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

[tverbeure]

My takeaway was definitely not that all of Apple is using only one framework.

[almostgotcaught]

then please enlighten me: what does the sentence mean?

[tormeh]

Only in Silicon Valley. But if you can, definitely do.