[almostgotcaught]

> Even Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

This is like when journalists write clickbait article titles by omitting all qualifiers (eg "states banning fluoride" when it's only some states).

One framework added a CUDA backend. You think all of Apple uses only one framework? Further what makes you think this even gets internal use?

[j45]

I didnt say any of those things at all.

Only that Apple not only might use CUDA internally but made a public release available too.

CUDA seems to be a trigger word in this thread for some.

https://9to5mac.com/2025/07/15/apples-machine-learning-frame...

[almostgotcaught]

> I didnt say any of those things at all.

what does this sentence mean?

> Apple is simply exporting to CUDA now.

[tverbeure]

My takeaway was definitely not that all of Apple is using only one framework.

[almostgotcaught]

then please enlighten me: what does the sentence mean?

[dang]

Can you please stop posting in the cross-examining, flamewar style? It's not what this site is for. We want people to learn from each other here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[almostgotcaught]

what exactly is the acceptable style of discourse here then? purely exultant tropes and clickbait i guess.