[mbac32768]

Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist:

> Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.

[AdieuToLogic]

> Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist:

  Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for 
  let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.

True. They are different languages after all, sharing a common ancestor in ML[0] yet diverging for their own reasons.

Still, the original concern was identified thusly:

>> I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments.

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language)