|
|
|
|
|
|
by AdieuToLogic
311 days ago
|
|
|
> Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist: Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for
let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.
True. They are different languages after all, sharing a common ancestor in ML[0] yet diverging for their own reasons.Still, the original concern was identified thusly: >> I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments. 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language) |
|
|