Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by M4R5H4LL 313 days ago
+1 - I work in finance, and there's no way we're sending our data and code outside the organization. We have our own H100s.
6 comments

Add big law to the list as well. There are at least a few firms here that I am just personally aware of running their models locally. In reality, I bet there are way more.
Add government here too (along with all the firms that service government customers)
Add healthcare. Cannot send our patients data to a cloud provider
A ton of EMR systems are cloud-hosted these days. There’s already patient data for probably a billion humans in the various hyperscalers.

Totally understand that approaches vary but beyond EMR there’s work to augment radiologists with computer vision to better diagnose, all sorts of cloudy things.

It’s here. It’s growing. Perhaps in your jurisdiction it’s prohibited? If so I wonder for how long.

In the US, HIPAA requires that health care providers complete a Business Associate Agreement with any other orgs that receive PHI in the course of doing business [1]. It basically says they understand HIPAA privacy protections and will work to fulfill the contracting provider's obligations regarding notification of breaches and deletion. Obviously any EMR service will include this by default.

Most orgs charge a huge premium for this. OpenAI offers it directly [2]. Some EMR providers are offering it as an add-on [3], but last I heard, it's wicked expensive.

1: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities...

2: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8660679-how-can-i-get-a-...

3: https://www.ntst.com/carefabric/careguidance-solutions/ai-do...

> Most LLM companies might not even offer it.

I'm pretty sure the LLM services of the big general-purpose cloud providers do (I know for sure that Amazon Bedrock is a HIPAA Eligible Service, meaning it is covered within their standard Business Associate Addendum [their name for the Business Associate Agreeement as part of an AWS contract].)

https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/hipaa-eligible-services-re...

I worked a big health care company recently. We were using Azure's private instances of the GPT models. Fully industry compliant.
Even if it's possible, there is typically a lot of paperwork to get that stuff approved.

There might be a lot less paperwork to just buy 50 decent GPU's and have the IT guy self-host.

Europe? US? In Finland doctors can send live patient encounters to azure openai for transcription and summarization.
In the US, it would be unthinkable for a hospital to send patient data to something like ChatGPT or any other public services.

Might be possible with some certain specific regions/environments of Azure tho, because iirc they have a few that support government confidentiality type of stuff, and some that tout HIPAA compliance as well. Not sure about details of those though.

Possibly stupid question, but does this apply to things like M365 too? Because just like with Inference providers, the only thing keeping them from reading/abusing your data is a pinky promise contract.

Basically, isn't your data as safe/unsafe in a sharepoint folder as it is sending it to a paid inference provider?

Yap, companies are just paranoid, because it's new. Just like the cload back then. Sooner or later everyone will use an ai provider
A lot of people and companies use local storage and compute instead of the cloud. Cloud data is leaked all the time.
Look at (private) banks in Switzerland, there are enough press release, and I can confirm most of them.

Managing private clients direct data is still a concern if it can be directly linked to them.

Only JB I believe have on premise infrastructure for these use cases.

This is not a shared sentiment across the buy side. I’m guessing you work at a bank?
Does it mean that renting a Bare metal server with H100s is also out of question for your org?
Do you have your own platform to run inference?