[yumlogic]

Relative stability, focus on family, growth, men as head of household, minimal single parent families, women spending time with their kids.

Raising kids is a full time job. I am doing both as a father and also as a founder. My wife does not work, does minimal contribution here and there. I dont know where she spends time but she is unavailable. I would rather do it myself than keep fighting.

I think from population front we are not going to have baby boom anytime in next 30 years. Technology will create more isolation than ever. Laws never favor men.

India, most populous country, recently dropped birth rates below replacement level. That is probably most fertile land (for food and reproduction) and yet they are falling behind.

I think unless we see dramatic change in policies worldwide (not going to happen) that puts men and families as center of policy making, it will be all doom from here.

Come back in 30-50 years when new generation is in charge and thinking patterns change.

[louwrentius]

> Relative stability, focus on family, growth, men as head of household, minimal single parent families, women spending time with their kids.

This reads as deeply obnoxious sexism. Man as head of the household, sounds like religious fundamentalism.

[mensetmanusman]

Can behavioral evolution be sexist?

[louwrentius]

I'm going to bet that 'behaviour evolution' doesn't diminishes women into a role as subjugated to their husband.

The idea that women are their own person with their own agency and desires seems foreign to you.

[yumlogic]

Typical liberal talk rather than solving the problem.

It worked for centuries. No one is stopping women from working or doing anything. But, making whole world gynocentric and policies around it is how you get mass inequality.

For a societal change, things have to change at fundamental level. Are you aware that below $120k - $150k it is impossible to raise two kids, mortgage, healthcare, and live in a no-drug ridden neighborhood?

Decades of mistakes and yet you come here with sexism talk. Words are cheap. Life is hard.

[louwrentius]

> For a societal change, things have to change at fundamental level. Are you aware that below $120k - $150k it is impossible to raise two kids, mortgage, healthcare, and live in a no-drug ridden neighborhood?

Your solution is to enslave women again so they become baby incubators, exactly as right-wing theocrats want. The real solution is ofcourse 'socialism' and a rampant curtailment of capitalism, that is currently accelerating the migration of money from poor to rich.