[louwrentius]

> Relative stability, focus on family, growth, men as head of household, minimal single parent families, women spending time with their kids.

This reads as deeply obnoxious sexism. Man as head of the household, sounds like religious fundamentalism.

[mensetmanusman]

Can behavioral evolution be sexist?

[louwrentius]

I'm going to bet that 'behaviour evolution' doesn't diminishes women into a role as subjugated to their husband.

The idea that women are their own person with their own agency and desires seems foreign to you.

[yumlogic]

Typical liberal talk rather than solving the problem.

It worked for centuries. No one is stopping women from working or doing anything. But, making whole world gynocentric and policies around it is how you get mass inequality.

For a societal change, things have to change at fundamental level. Are you aware that below $120k - $150k it is impossible to raise two kids, mortgage, healthcare, and live in a no-drug ridden neighborhood?

Decades of mistakes and yet you come here with sexism talk. Words are cheap. Life is hard.

[louwrentius]

> For a societal change, things have to change at fundamental level. Are you aware that below $120k - $150k it is impossible to raise two kids, mortgage, healthcare, and live in a no-drug ridden neighborhood?

Your solution is to enslave women again so they become baby incubators, exactly as right-wing theocrats want. The real solution is ofcourse 'socialism' and a rampant curtailment of capitalism, that is currently accelerating the migration of money from poor to rich.