[vblanco]

Because you now need to go through virtual calls on functions that dont really need to be virtual, which means the possible cache miss from loading the virtual function from vtable, and then the impossibility of them being inlined. For example they have a ITexture interface with a function like virtual GetSize(). If it wasnt all through virtuals, that size would just be a vec2 in the class and then its a simple load that gets inlined.

[pjmlp]

At least on clang with LTO, with bitcode variant, that should be possible to devirtualize, assuming most of those interfaces only have a single implementation.

[ttoinou]

Ah yes this kind of interface ok indeed this doesn't seem like a useful layer when running the program. Maybe the compilers could optimize this though

[drysine]

They can sometimes

https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/02/15/devirtualizati...

[jeremiahar]

In my experience, as long as there's only a single implementation, devirtualization works well, and can even inline the functions. But you need to pass something along the lines of "-fwhole-program-vtables -fstrict-vtable-pointer" + LTO. Of course the vtable pointer is still present in the object. So I personally only use the aforementioned "thin headers" at a system level (IRenderer), rather than for each individual object (ITexture).