| I see this as partisan: - one side ignored Clinton using a private server as sec of state - this one ignores using Signal I haven’t seen arguments about what the standard is supposed to be or why this in particular is egregious. That would be more convincing than hyperventilating. Edit: If you read the article, there are both classified/secured and unsecured lines available at the station. So what specifically is the problem the administration uses Signal together with unsecured comms? I don’t follow the allegation its mere presence is problematic, when discussing general communications with other parts of the administration. Especially when accessed via separate/dedicated machine (distinct from secured systems). If you want to talk about the specifics of, eg, the Yemen war plans then do that — but this article does not. |