[ziddoap]

Thanks.

I was hoping for something a bit more authoritative than a reddit comment being copy/pasted to HN (e.g. an actual retraction, or a paper directly disputing the findings), but I'm guessing most of the community just ignored the paper due to the history of the author.

[dkural]

That comment has exactly what you're asking for: Links to papers that show there is no evidence for rotation asymmetry. The very first article linked in that Reddit comment is a scientific publication from the Royal Society with the title "No evidence for anisotropy in galaxy spin directions".

[ziddoap]

>That comment has exactly what you're asking for

No, it doesn't.

I was hoping to read something that addressed this specific paper. All of those links are papers published before Lior Shamir's paper was published.

The comment I originally replied to said "people pointed out he cherry-picked results". I thought "people" might be "scientists" and they might have pointed it out in a subsequent paper or something.

Thanks though.

[Retric]

The chronology or papers isn’t important here.

The cherry picking is clear from the difference in results not their timing.

[ZunarJ5]

Download the Pubpeer extension. There's often blips from someone.