[selfmodruntime]

The missing funding is something like 2 million dollars. Any US company could make this issue go away in an instant.

[Sonnigeszeug]

Its not a money problem, its a understanding problem.

Shouldn't the most powerful country has something like this? Being even in the forefront of it?

The USA was doing cyberprotection against Russia and cyberattacks across the world.

Now suddenly it doesn't need it anymore?

Like just did Russia go away (or has russia won and sits now in the white house)?

[drstewart]

You're right.

I don't understand why the EU wasn't funding it and isn't funding it now. I thought they're united against Russia?

[lentil_soup]

because they already do? https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/

please, stop spreading your weird anti-europe views

[drstewart]

Great. Then there's no loss here. What's the big deal?

[sweezyjeezy]

Your comments feel a bit incoherent - just extend your reasoning for why you think Europe should want to fund this back to the US again.

[testbjjl]

The GP sounds like one of these people who describe themselves as self made, or libertarian, where history begins where you like it and coalitions are only worthy when you’re the biggest benefactor. Best to ignore and let the leopards find them.

[drstewart]

Can you extend your reasoning for why you think the US should want to continue to fund this for the EU?

[hubabuba44]

We will see. I understand that money shouldn't be an issue but trust might be, no?