[lentil_soup]

because they already do? https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/

please, stop spreading your weird anti-europe views

[drstewart]

Great. Then there's no loss here. What's the big deal?

[sweezyjeezy]

Your comments feel a bit incoherent - just extend your reasoning for why you think Europe should want to fund this back to the US again.

[testbjjl]

The GP sounds like one of these people who describe themselves as self made, or libertarian, where history begins where you like it and coalitions are only worthy when you’re the biggest benefactor. Best to ignore and let the leopards find them.

[sweezyjeezy]

haha, sage advice

[drstewart]

Can you extend your reasoning for why you think the US should want to continue to fund this for the EU?

[sweezyjeezy]

"for"? You realise this is a homeland security matter for the US as well as the EU?

[drstewart]

Great. That's why the EU should fund it for the US. It's a security matter for them!

[lobsterthief]

It’s a security matter for the US.

It’s a security matter for the EU.

Both countries should pay for the security matter, as they were previously. Stop twisting the other poster’s words.