[mike_hearn]

Technically, "slippery slope" isn't a fallacy. It's just a name for the idea that one thing leads inevitably to another. It's not fallacious to extrapolate from past experience, even if that extrapolation turns out to be wrong.

[tpm]

I wrote "slippery slope fallacy", not just "slippery slope", for a reason.

[mike_hearn]

Arguing A->B is only a fallacy if no argument for the sequence is provided. A plausible argument was provided here based on prior experience of other governments. There's no fallacy if you just disagree on the probability.

[tpm]

No argument (not plausible, not probable, none) for the sequence was provided.

Communist revolution always precedes communist control of speech.