Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
mike_hearn
436 days ago
Arguing A->B is only a fallacy if no argument for the sequence is provided. A plausible argument was provided here based on prior experience of other governments. There's no fallacy if you just disagree on the probability.
1 comments
tpm
436 days ago
No argument (not plausible, not probable, none) for the sequence was provided.
Communist revolution always precedes communist control of speech.
link
Communist revolution always precedes communist control of speech.