[saurik]

I don't understand your response as it feels like it is also my point, and something I would say to you? :( If the LLM cannot do basic tasks such as this, what are you going to do? Keep throwing more "tools" at it and hope to start building stuff on top of it? People are trying to get these things to do complex multi-step reasoning tasks, including making changes to their codebase (?!), automating behaviors as "agents" that need to predictably and secure function... but, somehow, as part of the same explanation, it can't even translate API documentation, one of the most trivial code tasks a human does? There are reports that OpenAI is planning to sell "mid-tier agents for software development costing possibly $10,000 a month" (to quote The Information)... and yet, here we are, claiming it isn't up to writing API boilerplate? Help me make this make sense :(.

[nsonha]

> Keep throwing more "tools" at it and hope to start building stuff on top of it

Yes and it's working? People ARE CURRENTLY building things.

They are NOT currently whinning that LLM is not smart enough so they must sit and wait for the next model to be able to code any problem, (again RELIABLY) on demand.

> People are trying to get these things to do complex multi-step reasoning tasks, including making changes to their codebase (?!), automating behaviors as "agents" that need to predictably and secure function...

You understand that all these are powered by tools calling underneath? The planning and orchestration of tasks follows a structure, to be fed into tools. This is why a plain model cannot do shit, people have to make products with the right tools on top to make a llm behave the way they want, and not just chit chat endlessly.

The abitrary execution approach, if it ever works, is by building tools and MCP servers for code execution. Because obviously it's not the LLM server who executes code.

You clearly have never thought about how to actually build any of these things.

> ...writing API boilerplate

Tool/function calling can be anything, it's you who decided that you can only use it for API boilerplate. Does the word "function" always mean boilerplate in progranming?

[pests]

I feel like you are being overly hostile and you and saurik are both arguing the same point... maybe? Following this thread has not been easy, not sure which positions each of you are even defending.

[saurik]

I honestly clearly don't understand the downstream disagreement myself, am getting tired of being shouted at today, and feel like entering this part of the thread by replying to someone who was clearly already past their breaking point to defend what they had already claimed was an "idiotic take that many people seem to have", was a mistake ;P.

[imtringued]

How does the model retrieve documentation? Through an MCP server?