[stavros]

Doesn't it get tiring to try and find the word "AI" in otherwise unrelated articles and then go to the effort of posting about how it'll give you extra hands?

Like, what's the usefulness of this comment? "I don't like this trivial minor detail about the phone, nobody should buy one!"

[az09mugen]

What's wrong with the fact of wanting exactly what you see on the screen and not the image but with some ai-produced artifacts ? It's not a "trivial minor detail" if you get accustomed to poor quality of photo due to non-existing details. Technology over time should improve in quality, and if not, it means people are trying make money over your ignorance with cheap-and-low-quality-yet-almost-good-looking new product. Please don't let that kind of manufacturer/seller win.

Having said that, it might probably be some kind of DLSS/FSR just for the photo.

[stavros]

There's nothing wrong with that. There is something off about posting anti-AI comments on a phone review, just because you spotted the word AI in it.

I'm just tired of the AI hate on what's supposed to be an intellectually curious site.

[rchaud]

What is left to be curious about in the image gen "AI" that companies are stuffing in? It's not a novel new tool that people love using, it represents a box every company has to check to head off the "what is your AI strategy?" question from market analysts.