[az09mugen]

What's wrong with the fact of wanting exactly what you see on the screen and not the image but with some ai-produced artifacts ? It's not a "trivial minor detail" if you get accustomed to poor quality of photo due to non-existing details. Technology over time should improve in quality, and if not, it means people are trying make money over your ignorance with cheap-and-low-quality-yet-almost-good-looking new product. Please don't let that kind of manufacturer/seller win.

Having said that, it might probably be some kind of DLSS/FSR just for the photo.

[stavros]

There's nothing wrong with that. There is something off about posting anti-AI comments on a phone review, just because you spotted the word AI in it.

I'm just tired of the AI hate on what's supposed to be an intellectually curious site.

[rchaud]

What is left to be curious about in the image gen "AI" that companies are stuffing in? It's not a novel new tool that people love using, it represents a box every company has to check to head off the "what is your AI strategy?" question from market analysts.