|
|
|
|
|
by 2muchcoffeeman
525 days ago
|
|
>Especially given that only HN'ers are 100% certain that training a model is infringement. In the real world, this is not a settled question. Why worry about obeying laws that don't even exist yet? This is exactly why people are against it. Your argument is that there is no definitive law. Therefore the creators of the data you scrape to train, and their wishes are irrelevant. If the motivation was to help humanity, they’d think twice about stepping on the toes of the humanity they want to save and we’d hear more about nontrivial uses. |
|
Correct, that is the position of the law. Here in America, we don't take the position, held in many other countries, that everything not explicitly permitted is forbidden. This is a good thing.
If the motivation was to help humanity, they’d think twice about stepping on the toes of the humanity they want to save
Whether it is permissible to train models with copyrighted content is up to the courts and Congress, not us. Until then, no one's toes are being stepped on. Everybody whose work was used to train the models still holds the same rights to that work that they held before.