[2muchcoffeeman]

>Until then, no one's toes are being stepped on. Everybody whose work was used to train the models still holds the same rights to that work that they held before.

And yet artists don’t feel like their work should be used for training.

I’m not sure how you can argue that the intentions are unknowable, when clearly you and the AI companies don’t care about the people whose work they have to use to train their models and these people’s wishes. Motivation is greed.

[CamperBob2]

And yet artists don’t feel like their work should be used for training.

The law isn't really all that interested in how "artists feel." Neither am I, as you've surmised. The artists don't care how I feel, so it would be kind of weird for me to hold any other position.

In any case, copyright maximalism impoverishes us all.