Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DoctorOetker 519 days ago
That seems totally backwards.

In the event of power loss, the data and voice recorded have lower priority than cabin lighting?!

And the cherry on top is that this was the case on 737's until ~ 2010?!

Defusing my bullsh!t alarm with a second layer of bullsh.t?

I would swallow it all ad fundum if you can provide HN with reliable links to manuals, procedures, ... describing how electrical energy for the passenger cabin is prioritized over the data and voice flight recorders!

2 comments

I don't know if that's correct or not, but if I were to prioritize, I'd put safe passenger evacuation ahead of the recorders.
if the parent poster was talking about merely emergency lights being battery powered, and hence main passenger cabin lighting turning off a full 4 minutes before the crash, we go back in a circle and have to explain the apparent absence of passengers texting friends and family about a scary power loss during descent (people would quickly try to figure out if power sockets for their consumer electronics were no longer providing power either and learn from each other that it is the case).
I'm no expert, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's much, MUCH easier to get "non-critical" systems hooked up to new, better equipment as it would undergo far less checks and approvals.
"This is your Captain speaking, we may only have a few minutes to restore power, I am hereby commandeering all your USB cables, we daisy chain them from the passenger cabin to the cockpit" ... ?