|
|
|
|
|
by ordu
543 days ago
|
|
> if it was a coverup, then the EAAID gave away its own game by attaching the BEA’s comprehensive findings. I'd say, that EAAID had written the report in a way to make the coveraup unmistakable. I mean, the reasoning is not just bad, it contradicts to itself in a way, that to my mind one couldn't achieve without a deliberation. So it is possible that EAAID was forced to support the hypothesis but resisted it in the only way it could. |
|
What was the motivation for Egypt to insist on a bomb detonation beyond them believing that is what happened?