|
|
|
|
|
by Closi
590 days ago
|
|
You are right - it's a balance and definitely a matter of taste. Although not-ornate doesn't necessarily mean dead-simple or bad. For instance compare the following: > The reverberations of the trumpet stirred the knights from their deep repose, igniting a tumultuous awakening. With a very similar sentence from Tolkein: > At that moment, among the trees nearby, a horn rang out. It rent
the night like fire on a hill-top. Awake! Fear! Fire! Foes! Awake! This is much less ornate, with simpler language, yet easier to parse and the image is much more vivid. |
|
Therefore for not-so-important details like “the knight woke up” that are just about giving the reader necessary info to follow along, it’s generally better to put less weight and emphasis by stating it plainly. This way when you do add emphasis to make the reader visualize a crucial scene or situation, or describe emotional states at these moments etc, they will jump out as being special rather than just more of the same.
In my experience, every great writer follows this pattern, though they begin at different baselines. It’s fundamental to good writing, just like creating attention hierarchy is fundamental to good graphic design.