|
|
|
|
|
by shiroiushi
611 days ago
|
|
>Bicycle paths on walkways are also hazardous to cyclists - and stressful I never said they were great, just better than riding alongside cars. I ride on walkways every single day here in Tokyo, frequently very, very, very close to pedestrians; it IS stressful trying to dodge the chaos of pedestrians and also other cyclists who are all crammed together on narrow sidewalks. It's still better and safer than riding with cars, which is why all the other cyclists here (esp. mothers with children) do it too. >but most cars do pay attention and try not to hit you It doesn't matter: just one car not paying attention will likely kill you, or at least cause lifelong injuries. Running into a pedestrian is not at all likely to cause such trauma: the masses and the speeds are both far, far less. |
|
Most collisions with cars are also not even likely to be as dangerous as you suggest - the really hazardous traffic is lorries, buses etc. I think you also downplay the risk of serious injury when colliding with a pedestrian - to both of you. This also confers potential legal risk, as you are the road user likely to be liable in this jurisdiction should a vulnerable path user incur a serious injury.
No doubt risk averse cyclists like mothers with children are likely to prefer these shared paths whatever the prevailing conditions, but that doesn’t mean they are outright superior and the specific context is likely to matter a great deal.