[card_zero]

Well, his parents supposed otherwise.

> Robert delivers a eulogy for his son in which he speaks of the sorrow he and Trude had felt, believing that his short life had been one void of meaning, friendship, love and belonging.

Edit: I wasn't trying to attack WoW, so here's the next line too:

> But, he continues, over the past few days they have come to understand that this was not the case, and that he had experienced all these things.

[Tor3]

At that funeral where he held that speech, a group of Mats' online friends were present, having arrived earlier and met the father. The leader of Mats' group in WoW also talked at the funeral. What Robert (the father) actually said was that when Mats died they had that feeling and that worry. But shortly after that the emails started coming (after Robert had written about what had happened, on Mats' blog, he did so because he actually thought there were people out there who cared.

I recommend watching the documentary, which contains private video recordings of that eulogy.

[swores]

His parents supposed otherwise before they knew about his online stuff, you're making it sound like they still felt that way about his online time too.

[card_zero]

OK, WoW is great and rich and fulfilling, but also, DMD is not necessarily a prison sentence. I think that covers all the bases?

[thegginthesky]

This is not the point. The point is you misquoted the article without understanding the full context, and was corrected. The parents weren't judgmental of an online life, they were just unaware. Matter of fact, on the documentary from one of the replies, it felt that they were glad their son had good friends who really cared about him.

[card_zero]

Jeez. I understood the full context, I just wasn't even talking about that, and neither was the grandparent comment, I think. The "online life: wholesome or not?" debate has crept into this comment chain by accident.

[bigstrat2003]

> DMD is not necessarily a prison sentence.

Nobody said it was.