|
|
|
|
|
by sethaurus
620 days ago
|
|
From a legal point-of-view, yes, Reddit had control of the data and chose to alter the deal. And the app developer did have an exit plan: shutting down the app and refunding subscribers. The developer appears to have weighed his options, considered the strategy Reddit was communicating with the rollout of their API changes, and concluded that this was no longer a viable market. Many people expressed strong opinions about what the developer should do, but he appears to have remained calm and rational throughout the experience, and chose to walk away when it made sense. However: > The content is what the users wanted - and Reddit had the content... > ...in exchange for Reddit's content... > ...operating businesses based on someone else's data (moat)... Let's not fool ourselves: the data was created by and for the users, and it never belonged to Reddit in any moral sense. It's a regrettable externality of our legal framework that Reddit was able to withdraw their free API and prevent the community from accessing its own data how it saw fit. |
|
By using reddit and posting, you agree to their terms - the content belongs to them.
It's unreasonable to believe Reddit should continue offering free services to businesses that were making money off of Reddit's content.