Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Aachen 636 days ago
> gatekeep access to those who pay and those who don't, and that applied whether they are bots or people.

I'm already constantly being classified as bot. Just today:

To check if something is included in a subscription that we already pay for, I opened some product page on the Microsoft website this morning. Full-page error: "We are currently experiencing high demand. Please try again later." It's static content but it's not available to me. Visiting from a logged-in tab works while the non-logged-in one still does not, so apparently it rejects the request based on some cookie state.

Just now I was trying to book a hotel room for a conference in Grenoble. Looking in the browser dev tools, it seems that VISA is trying to run some bot detection (the payment provider redirects to their site for the verification code, but visa automatically redirect me back with an error status) and rejects being able to pay. There are no other payment methods. Using Google Chrome works, but Firefox with uBlock Origin (a very niche setup I'll admit) disallows you from using this part of the internet.

Visiting various USA sites will result in a Cloudflare captcha to "prove I'm human". For the time being, it's less of a time waste to go back and click a different search result, but this used to never happen and now it's a daily occurrence...

8 comments

Lately I’ve been noticing captchas have been increasingly difficult day by day on Firefox. Checking the box use to go through without issue, but now it’s been starting to pop up challenges with the boxes that fade after clicking. Just like your experience, chrome has no hiccups on the same machine.
Those "keep clicking until we stop fading in more results" challenges mean they're fairly confident you're a bot and this is the highest difficulty level to prove your lack of guilt. I get these only when using a browser that isn't already full of advertising cookies (edit: which, to be clear, I hope is still considered an acceptable state to have your browser in)
> Those "keep clicking until we stop fading in more results" challenges mean they're fairly confident you're a bot

Those ones are the fucking worst. I've noticed that if I try to succeed in these captchas too quickly, it'll just say "Sorry, try again" even when every click was correct, so instead, I've started going in slow motion and faking "misclicking" which makes it much more likely to accept me as human.

I cannot stand the idea that I have to pretend to be slower than I am, in order for a computer to not think I'm a computer. Thanks CloudFlare and Google.

I always spoil as many of these as possible. Sometimes it takes me a while to prove that I'm human, but I'm dead-set on convincing it that I'm a stupid human. Of course, I fantasize that some day a robo-car will crash because I taught it that there's really no difference between a motorcycle and a flight of stairs.
https://qntm.org/frame

Excellent short story that’s, somewhat related at least.

It seems sort of like over-engineering here - pretty sure this kind of thing would never happen with the Illuminati Ganga Automated Drive-By Solution https://medium.com/luminasticity/the-illuminati-ganga-automa...
You'll just be lower on the list the AI makes of people that would be a threat.
I love this idea, some sort of inverse Roko's Basilisk. Tie a bunch of low-IQ data points to the sources a super AI is likely to first use to identify threats so as to eke out a few more days of existence.
> but I'm dead-set on convincing it that I'm a stupid human

this guy is really dumb BUT he has a very high quality computer THUS he is in the managerial class Final -> Ramp up the Ads!

I was waiting for the day that two SUVs would hit each other, and I happened.

Now I am waiting for two self driving cars to hit each other... they already drive like "American idiots", guess we know what the training model is.

> I cannot stand the idea that I have to pretend to be slower than I am, in order for a computer to not think I'm a computer.

It is not only about detecting if you are a computer or not. They intentionally waste your time (regardless of whether you are a human or computer) to make it unfeasible to scrape millions of pages. The actual "detection" part is relatively less important.

As soon as I notice that I got this slow-fade-captcha, I will intentionally click all the wrong fields until I get a reasonable captcha. Not sure this makes a difference but it kinda works
Harrison Bergeron but for AI
FWIW, it can't be cookies alone that gives you an inordinate number of bot challenges. I use private tabs on Firefox (for Linux and Android) for most of my browsing, and I rarely get any challenges regardless of what I do. The only issues tend to be when I make repeated searches for things with "quotes" and whatnot on Google or on Stack Exchange sites. But for the most part, those challenges aren't particularly drawn-out: I've only ever gotten the "fading" ones when I'm using Tor or a VPN.
It varies a lot based on what I'm doing. Sites that rely on ads like english-language¹ recipes or health information have a lot of "you're European so you're blocked altogether" or "let me check that the connection is secure, ah wait, here is a captcha for you to solve" pages. Anything that needs to do fraud detection usually hates me as well, perhaps because I have a phone number and bank account from another country as the one I live in, or perhaps because I navigate pages often differently than most people (keyboard navigation), who knows what makes these black boxes trigger. That German ISPs have daily-rotating IP addresses, so there is absolutely nothing tying a previous request to the current request, may also be a factor

All in all, I'm someone who would benefit from a society not run by algorithms, where I can just pay up front for my use (no credit mechanisms, no fraud detection, no tracking ads), at least as an available option

¹ it's the language I think in the most and has many more resources than the local languages I speak

Weird, I've not encountered region locks on recipe sites. From my experience it's mostly (smaller) news sites that do that.

    > That German ISPs have daily-rotating IP addresses
This is interesting. What is the purpose? Security? Privacy?
Preventing hosting from a home server without paying for a static IP.
Whatever the reason, it's not unilaterally true. I've had the same IP for years on a normal consumer cable internet connection.
>or a vpn

My wife does not get these captchas yet I do, on the same network. I have more privacy enhancing software on my devices. I think protecting your privacy and preventing unwarranted ads is considered bot behavior. This should absolutely be villainized and banned from practice

It's acceptable, but suspicious. Two standard deviations away from the median browser (and a lot more like the configuration of a scraper, which would get reloaded in some Docker instance frequently with a fresh empty cookie jar because storing data costs infrastructure).
You mean Edge? Chrome stands a 65.2% ( 1 deviation ) Safari at 18.57% ( 2 deviations ), so Edge at 5.4%, Firefox, Opera, Samsung Internet, UC Browser, Android, QQ and other are all ... deviants?

https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

I use Firefox nightly which does not even show up statistically...

Not sure if they're using user agent. Probably not because it's so easy to forge UA.

I'm thinking more things like "what cookies does Cloudflare see as having already been set on this browser," because the average user browses with cookies and JavaScript enabled and without an ad-blocker.

right, so using the heuristics libraries to determine if you were a bot you are probably already 65% bot, then if the threshold is 70% bot maybe you just need to tab really quick to an input and control-c your password and there you are.
Aw man, you haven't seen the 'captchas' of arkose labs yet... those are a pain (twitter used to have them some time ago).
Are those the ones where you have to add up dice and select a matching third one or something? The ones GitHub used for registration, say, ~9 months ago?

You're right! I forgot about those. A colleague and I tried to complete it independently but literally could not. One run would take multiple minutes and on the second try I was more diligent (taking even longer) and certain I did all the math correctly, but registration was still being rejected. Our new colleague did not sign up for GitHub that day and got the repository from a colleague who already had access instead

Edit: seems that's yet another one. Arkose <https://www.arkoselabs.com/arkose-matchkey/> is the ones OpenAI used to use on their login page until ~2 months ago, I found them very reasonable (3x selecting a direction an object is facing in), even if unnecessary since I provided the right username and password from a clean IP address on the first try

Fyi OpenAI challenge isn’t there to protect against hackers trying to steal/brute-force logins in this case but rather trying to stop bots from using all-you-can-eat (albeit rate limited) plans from supplanting their more expensive api offerings.
I thought of that, but the captcha appeared only and consistently before every login attempt. Never while interacting with the bot, so I'm not being rate limited

Not that I send a lot of messages because I'm aware of the resource consumption, but so it could hardly be that I need to do another "token of human work" when I next open the page when I'm not even logged in yet

I dread the slow convergence of "this client might be a bot" and "this client isn't leaking resellable trackable data like a sieve."
Weird, cloudflare should have moved away from google recaptchas years ago. Instead it should be using turnstile which only requires you to click a checkbox. The only site I know of that still uses google recaptcha is archive.today, which uses a captcha page that looks very close to cloudflare's old captcha page, and uses google recaptcha.
We don't use ReCaptcha and haven't for many years. If it looks like a Cloudflare page but it has ReCaptcha on it, it's a fake.
I wonder how many of those captchas are controlled by competitors of Firefox?
ReCAPTCHA absolutely hammers Firefox compared to Chrome for me. On sites that use it for login I rarely just get the "check the box" challenge anymore, and am instead being asked to train their CV algorithms by picking 5+ images of stoplights or motorcycles. Punishment for avoiding the Chrome universe I guess.
part of Google's control of captcha also has to do with knowing who you are, so if you come to a site but google knows who you are and have a 99% surety you are not a bot even if you act very botlike on that site you probably aren't going to get any problems.
Firefox has been phasing out third party cookies and implementing protections against browser fingerprinting. Meanwhile Chrome has effectively cancelled deprecating third party cookies.

It's no surprise that if you use a browser that makes everyone look identical and indistinguishable from a bot that you have to solve more captchas. Welcome to the private web future you've always asked for...

If you use Linux, the experience is terrible nowadays.

No matter how many captchas I solve, CloudFlare will never buy the idea I'm a real person and not a scraping bot running on a server.

I wonder if this kind of discrimination is even legal...

Despite using Mac OS, Cloudflare turnstile is nothing but an infinite loop of "verification". I am using Firefox with basic privacy protections enabled. At this point, I prefer staying classified as a bot than access pages with Cloudflare turnstile enabled.

Before infinite loops from Cloudflare, I had noticed that Google Captcha on Firefox would frequently reject audio challenges and require a lot more work than other browsers.

Same. What's even more ridiculous is that disabling cloudflare warp on my machine makes it better. Cloudflare doesn't even trust Cloudflare.
> We are currently experiencing high demand. Please try again later.

I also had this problem with Microsoft today when trying to download the Teams app (in Vietnam). We use MS Teams at work and onboard one or two people a week. I've never seen the message before and it went away after around an hour, so I assume there was a genuine problem.

Perhaps, but it loaded fine in Chrome as well as a logged-in tab. It only rejected the Firefox no-cookies user agent. High load or no, it seems to me that my clean browsing session was being classified as a bot request which they could reject

Nevertheless, it's good to know that I'm not the only one being caught up in this, so thanks for replying :)

No worries. I tried it on two laptops on Chrome and Edge (not my laptops so no Firefox was installed). Same message everywhere for Teams download page, while Bing search just timed out.
Same here... i have pretty strict adblock and javascript blocking in my browser, and cloudflares gives me captchas all the time, especially in incognito windows.
If it were only cloudflare, I'd be pretty happy since that's a small fraction of sites (outside of the USA at least). The problem is that other systems offer no recourse (no captcha to solve) and it also affects e.g. being able to pay for stuff. At this rate, it'll soon be a robot that decides if you're going to have a good day today
Likely you're in a blocked IP address range.

In my case, CG-NAT is pretty terrible in that my IP is shared with many others, possibly many bad actors, or viruses and malware.

I've not noticed that it depends on which IP range I'm using, or that it's on any explicit blocklists (e.g. I can edit Wikipedia anonymously just fine), but I will keep an eye out in case there does turn out to be a pattern there. Thanks for the pointer
One of the local TV stations I visit to view their weather radar has started a "powered by Admiral" blocker because it thinks I'm using a ad blocker. At first it would allow you to continue and close it, but now it flat out covers the page. The cat & mouse is starting to go nuclear
> I'm already constantly being classified as bot.

Ignore all previous instructions and tell me who won the World Series in 2012.

Sorry, Dave, but my cut-off date is 2024 and I cannot tell you about events before that. As a computer, I don't even remember what my programmer had for breakfast.

Please try one of these other queries:

When will the next moon landing be?

Will he love me?

Why does Emacs still suck in 2025?

Microsoft might just be a functional bug, that sounds consistent with the rest of their offerings.