|
|
|
|
|
by colechristensen
640 days ago
|
|
What is "ethical" when it comes to a social media network? That either means "moderates so that everyone posting agrees with what I mean by ethics to a satisfying degree" (and folks do not agree on this) or just "I have fewer complaints about the moderation of this social network than the other popular ones". To boil this down to what I actually mean with an example: What are the "ethical" allowed things to post about climate change on your social network? (please don't actually fall into the trap of actually discussing climate change here). I can think of about three or four different answers to this question that large blocks of people would passionately defend. And so either "ethical" social networks don't exist or there is only one true ethical way to do things and that way is people have to agree with my position and lots of people who don't agree with me are very wrong about ethics. You can do this for a lot of topics and you'll find that contrary to US politics, there are not actually only two ways of thinking about the world and one of them awful. |
|