|
|
|
|
|
by bradford
651 days ago
|
|
It's a great site, but I don't think many of the listings could be properly categorized as old-growth. For example, I checked out a few samples: "The oldest trees are estimated to be over 200 years old."
https://www.oldgrowthforest.net/md-schoolhouse-woods "The age of the oldest trees is not certain, but 100 rings have been counted on a downed loblolly pine and a downed chestnut oak. There is no old-growth forest in this park, however, the strong protections put in place on this forest ensure that it may recover in time."
https://www.oldgrowthforest.net/va-james-river-park-system (The exact definition of old-growth isn't agreed on, but I've seen some foresty documents in the PNW that demand tree age of 400+ years as a prerequisite for the old-growth categorization) |
|