|
|
|
|
|
by RandomThoughts3
665 days ago
|
|
> I find it deeply uncomfortable that the HN contingent is rushing to defend the French government on this matter. I find it deeply uncomfortable that the HN contingent is rushing to defend Telegram like if it was an open attack of free speach and not justified by Telegram completes lack of cooperation in crime investigations. >If Telegram really was not answering enforcement requests in a timely manner, then France should have moved against the company either through a direct ban on the app itself or other court action. Putting its CEO in prison sends a message. Yes, it sends the message that executives are actually responsible for what their company does. That's a good message. |
|
Acting opportunistically without warning and or out of vengefulness or malice brings Justice into ill-repute.
Like entrapment, this is action is about as low and debased as it gets.
The French Government could have banned Telegram across French territories, not only has it not done that but French leaders actually use the program. Such hypocrisy is mind-blowing.
Whatever happened to Liberté, égalité, fraternité?