|
|
|
|
|
|
by hilbert42
665 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, it does send a message. But it should only have been done after rules have been set and are clear to everyone. Simply, proper law first established and in place and then due and proper process followed. Acting opportunistically without warning and or out of vengefulness or malice brings Justice into ill-repute. Like entrapment, this is action is about as low and debased as it gets. The French Government could have banned Telegram across French territories, not only has it not done that but French leaders actually use the program. Such hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Whatever happened to Liberté, égalité, fraternité? |
|
|
Rules are and were always very clear. That's called the law. I don't understand why people here are acting like if there somehow was something surprising in Durov arrest.
> Like entrapment, this is action is about as low and debased as it gets.
There is no entrapment here. Entrapment is illegal in France. Durov was arrested as part of an investigation on Telegram practices. Law inforcement was not in anyway part of Telegarm not respecting the law.
> The French Government could have banned Telegram across French territories
The issue is not about Telegram as an application which is and remains perfectly legal. The issue is with Telegram as a company which is not helping in criminal investigations. Why should France ban a legal application?