Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by null3cksor 770 days ago
Thats just over 88 hours.
5 comments

~400,000 GB * 8 bits/Byte = 3,200,000 Gb at 1Gbps that's 3,200,000 seconds or about 888 hours or about 37 days. If that's 400TB * 1024, instead of 1000, then it's a bit longer, pushing 38 days.
Sheesh, the TCP and whatever else overhead is probably more than the 24 byte difference of 1024 vs 1000..
Did you ever try and calculate the difference?

1TiB = 1024GiB = 10241024MiB = 102410241024KiB = 1024102410241024 bytes...

1024^4 is 1099511627776 bytes...

So it's 1099 GB vs 1000 GB which is a solid 10% difference. Your TCP overhead is not anywhere close to 10% unless you are sending with an MTU of 240...

88 hours would be at 1 GB/sec = 8 Gbps, not 1 Gbps.

400 TB over 30 days is about 1.23 Gbps.

It’s ~888 hours, or 37 days.

You dropped a 0 somewhere.

ChatGPT and Wolfram Alpha confirmed to me that it's about 37 days, which is 888 hours, not 88 :)

Wolfram Alpha: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=400tb+at+1gbps ChatGPT: https://chatgpt.com/share/4ddd464a-dabd-4c12-9cc4-e8271a51a6...

(ChatGPT did a great job at breaking down the problem)

So did your sibling comments and I imagine anyone with very basic maths skills could.

And most likely burning a lot less carbon than ChatGPT.

Except everyone is forgetting the TCP/IP overhead. I also asked ChatGPT, and 400TB of data creates a 10.7TB overhead, which adds ~5 days...
if you had done the math yourself you would have arrived at a different number....
How so, care to educate the lazy?

It's all theoretical anyway, if it's 400TB split into individual files, and I'm using millions of HTTPS GET's, that's also overhead...

Gotta love nerds spending their Saturday (nights) arguing about some simple maths...