[happymellon]

> How is it "boiling the planet"?

Because Americans are using intensive methods to extract oil from the ground.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=25372

And they are behind other western countries in how they produce energy.

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

> And vegan leather is a silly thing to nitpick over

It was a phrase that was used and I find it weird. I would not have mentioned it otherwise.

> there's probably roughly as much plastic in a pair of shoes as in a disposable water bottle you use once.

I avoid those too. Metal reusable, and had it for quite a few years now.

You seem very angry that someone doesn't like the phrase "vegan leather" for a product that is shit for the planet.

[dTal]

I know tone is hard to read over text but I'm honestly baffled how you got "very angry" from my comment. I'm simply responding? Nobody claims that vegan leather is perfect but veganism is about making a best effort. Objecting to pleather on the grounds of "microplastics" seems like an unreasonably high standard. Are we also to deny that lettuce is vegan because slugs get killed? Defining "vegan" in such a way that nothing is vegan is counterproductive.

[neuralRiot]

I can easily clear up the difference, “vegan” leather can or cannot harm animals you cannot be sure “if” or how much, real leather on the other hand cannot exist without a dead animal. As a vegan I usually find these type of comments more like a defensive “you’re not better than me” same as when they tell you that avocados and almond milk use a lot of water and iphones are made using child labor.

[happymellon]

There are other options.

The murder of an animal is bad.

The death of all living things is also bad. Why do people feel the need to defend shitty plastics?

[neuralRiot]

For leather, meat, dairy there is already a dead animal, for plastics might be in the future, maybe not. If you focus purely on the environmental “superiority” of leather remember also that it is a byproduct of factory farming and that its production is not as “environmentally friendly” as it looks at first.